| Title |
Prevention of postoperative delirium in elderly patients planned for elective surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s201323 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
TL Janssen, AR Alberts, L Hooft, FUS Mattace-Raso, CA Mosk, L van der Laan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 16% |
| United States | 3 | 12% |
| Spain | 3 | 12% |
| Mexico | 2 | 8% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
| Portugal | 1 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 72% |
| Scientists | 3 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 326 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 63 | 19% |
| Unknown | 147 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 88 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Psychology | 6 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 33 | 10% |
| Unknown | 152 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,812,285
of 25,931,626 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#290
of 1,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,790
of 366,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#6
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,931,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.