↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Pharmacokinetics and safety of olodaterol administered with the Respimat Soft Mist inhaler in subjects with impaired hepatic or renal function

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacokinetics and safety of olodaterol administered with the Respimat Soft Mist inhaler in subjects with impaired hepatic or renal function
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, March 2016
DOI 10.2147/copd.s94234
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina Kunz, Doreen Luedtke, Anna Unseld, Alan Hamilton, Atef Halabi, Martina Wein, Stephan Formella

Abstract

In two trials, the influences of hepatic and renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of olodaterol, a novel long-acting inhaled β2-agonist for treatment of COPD, were investigated. The first trial included eight subjects with mild hepatic function impairment (Child-Pugh A), eight subjects with moderate impairment (Child-Pugh B), and 16 matched healthy subjects with normal hepatic function. The second trial included eight subjects with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance <30 mL·min(-1)) and 14 matched healthy subjects with normal renal function. Subjects received single doses of 20 or 30 μg olodaterol administered with the Respimat Soft Mist inhaler. Olodaterol was well tolerated in all subjects. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of dose-normalized area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 4 hours (AUC0-4) for subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment compared to healthy subjects were 97% (75%-125%) and 105% (79%-140%), respectively. Corresponding values for dose-normalized maximum concentration (C max) were 112% (84%-151%) (mild impairment) and 99% (73%-135%) (moderate impairment). The geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of AUC0-4 for subjects with severe renal impairment compared to healthy subjects was 135% (94%-195%), and for C max was 137% (84%-222%). There was no significant relationship between creatinine clearance and AUC0-4 or C max. Renal clearance of olodaterol was reduced to 20% of normal in severe renal impairment. Mild to moderate hepatic function impairment or severe renal function impairment did not result in a clinically relevant increase of olodaterol systemic exposure after a single inhaled dose.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 45%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Researcher 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 15%
Unknown 3 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2016.
All research outputs
#16,048,318
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#1,485
of 2,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,961
of 312,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#53
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.