↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Analgesic use among nursing homes residents, with and without dementia, in Poland

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Analgesic use among nursing homes residents, with and without dementia, in Poland
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, March 2016
DOI 10.2147/cia.s101475
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agnieszka Neumann-Podczaska, Tomasz Nowak, Aleksandra Suwalska, Dorota Łojko, Roma Krzymińska-Siemaszko, Elżbieta Kozak-Szkopek, Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis

Abstract

Many age-associated diseases are accompanied by pain. There is no doubt that pain is underrecognized among elderly nursing home residents and the diagnosing of pain is a real challenge in subjects with dementia. The aim of the study was to characterize analgesic use among nursing home residents and to delineate the putative associations between pain management and cognitive functions of elderly persons. The study involved 392 subjects (males:females - 81:311) with a mean age of 83.6±5.9 years. The residents' medical files in relation to diagnoses and drug consumption were analyzed, and the screening of cognitive functions was performed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). One hundred and thirteen residents (28.8%) received some analgesics. Among them 84 (21.4%) used them routinely, 25 (6.4%) - pro re nata (PRN) and four (1.0%) - both routinely and PRN. Non-opioid analgesics were taken routinely by 53 residents, weak opioids by nine subjects, and one person was receiving strong opioids. Additionally, three individuals were taking a combination preparation of tramadol and acetaminophen. The rate of subjects who were not receiving any pain treatment was higher in residents with MMSE between 0 and 9 points than in those with MMSE between 24 and 30 points (P=0.0151). Furthermore, ten residents (9.1%) with severe dementia were treated with analgesics PRN. The results of our study point to a remarkably low use of analgesics in nursing home residents in Poland and indicate a need to introduce pain evaluation and monitoring of drug treatment appropriateness as a standard procedure in the geriatric assessment in nursing homes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 23%
Other 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 18 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2018.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#818
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,701
of 312,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#20
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.