| Title |
The effectiveness of Tai Chi for short-term cognitive function improvement in the early stages of dementia in the elderly: a systematic literature review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s202055 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karine Huy-Leng Lim, Alex Pysklywec, Michelle Plante, Louise Demers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 9 | 39% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 91% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 148 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Researcher | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 67 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Psychology | 8 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 68 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,305,159
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#248
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,601
of 363,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#4
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.