↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

New developments in the treatment of rosacea – role of once-daily ivermectin cream

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
32 X users
patent
5 patents
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
New developments in the treatment of rosacea – role of once-daily ivermectin cream
Published in
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, March 2016
DOI 10.2147/ccid.s98091
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leah A Cardwell, Hossein Alinia, Sara Moradi Tuchayi, Steven R Feldman

Abstract

Rosacea is a chronic dermatological disorder with a variety of clinical manifestations localized largely to the central face. The unclear etiology of rosacea fosters therapeutic difficulty; however, subtle clinical improvement with pharmacologic treatments of various drug categories suggests a multifactorial etiology of the disease. Factors that may contribute to disease pathogenesis include immune abnormality, vascular abnormality, neurogenic dysregulation, presence of cutaneous microorganisms, UV damage, and skin barrier dysfunction. The role of ivermectin in the treatment of rosacea may be as an anti-inflammatory and anti-parasitic agent targeting Demodex mites. In comparing topical ivermectin and metronidazole, ivermectin was more effective; this treatment modality boasted more improved quality of life, reduced lesion counts, and more favorable participant and physician assessment of disease severity. Patients who received ivermectin 1% cream had an acceptable safety profile. Ivermectin is efficacious in decreasing inflammatory lesion counts and erythema.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 22 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Chemistry 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 23 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#717,240
of 25,856,713 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#75
of 921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,302
of 313,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them