↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Statin use and mortality of patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Statin use and mortality of patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, March 2016
DOI 10.2147/ott.s97993
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yang Meng, Yan-Biao Liao, Peng Xu, Wu-Ran Wei, Jia Wang

Abstract

The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of statin use on the mortality of patients with prostate cancer (PCa). An electronic search of PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases from inception to August 2015 was performed to find eligible studies. Articles investigating the association between statin use and mortality of PCa were identified. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random- or fixed-effects models. In total, 13 studies that enrolled 100,536 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Results showed that prediagnostic statin use had a significantly lower risk of both all-cause mortality (ACM; HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38-0.83) and PCa-specific mortality (PCSM; HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.36-0.77). Similarly, postdiagnostic statin use was correlated with reductions in both ACM (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.69-0.87) and PCSM (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.79). When stratified by primary treatment, postdiagnostic use of statins had a 0.4-fold lower risk of ACM in patients with PCa who were treated with local therapy; both pre- and postdiagnostic use of statins was correlated with a significantly lower risk of PCSM in patients who were treated with androgen deprivation therapy. Both pre- and postdiagnostic use of statins is associated with better overall survival and PCa-specific survival. This suggests a need for randomized controlled trials of statins in patients with PCa.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 20%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Librarian 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2016.
All research outputs
#17,443,636
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#1,152
of 3,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,193
of 313,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#43
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.