↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comparison of short-term and survival outcomes for transanal natural orifice specimen extraction with conventional mini-laparotomy after laparoscopic anterior resection for colorectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Management and Research, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of short-term and survival outcomes for transanal natural orifice specimen extraction with conventional mini-laparotomy after laparoscopic anterior resection for colorectal cancer
Published in
Cancer Management and Research, July 2019
DOI 10.2147/cmar.s209194
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sicheng Zhou, Xuewei Wang, Chuanduo Zhao, Wei Pei, Haitao Zhou, Qian Liu, Jianwei Liang, Zhixiang Zhou, Xishan Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 24%
Psychology 2 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 10 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2019.
All research outputs
#15,575,964
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#730
of 2,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,423
of 348,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#29
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,019 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.