↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Nasal high-flow versus noninvasive ventilation in patients with chronic hypercapnic COPD

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
Title
Nasal high-flow versus noninvasive ventilation in patients with chronic hypercapnic COPD
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, July 2019
DOI 10.2147/copd.s206111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jens Bräunlich, Dominic Dellweg, Andreas Bastian, Stephan Budweiser, Winfried Randerath, Dora Triché, Martin Bachmann, Christian Kähler, Abdel Hakim Bayarassou, Irmhild Mäder, Jens Geiseler, Norbert Köhler, David Petroff, Hubert Wirtz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 113 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 7 6%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 43 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Unspecified 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 43 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2020.
All research outputs
#5,168,664
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#616
of 2,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,315
of 363,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#15
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.