| Title |
The Danish in-hospital cardiac arrest registry (DANARREST)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Epidemiology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/clep.s201074 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lars W Andersen, Jane N Østergaard, Sussie Antonsen, Anette Weis, Jens Rosenberg, Finn L. Henriksen, Niels CF Sandgaard, Christian Skjærbæk, Søren Paaske Johnsen, Hans Kirkegaard |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 21% |
| Unknown | 5 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,332,782
of 23,485,296 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#176
of 740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,175
of 351,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,296 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.