↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Reliability and usability of a weighted version of the Functional Comorbidity Index

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Reliability and usability of a weighted version of the Functional Comorbidity Index
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, February 2019
DOI 10.2147/cia.s185112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anouk D Kabboord, Monica van Eijk, Lisette van Dingenen, Monique Wouters, Marieke Koet, Romke van Balen, Wilco P Achterberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 27 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 14%
Psychology 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 31 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2019.
All research outputs
#8,531,317
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#816
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,975
of 447,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#17
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.