↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A comparative study of the quality of non-stimulated and stimulated tears in normal eye male subjects using the tear ferning test

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Optometry, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
A comparative study of the quality of non-stimulated and stimulated tears in normal eye male subjects using the tear ferning test
Published in
Clinical Optometry, July 2019
DOI 10.2147/opto.s214597
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saud A Alanazi, Mohammed A Aldawood, Yousef S Badawood, Gamal A El-Hiti, Ali M Masmali

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 14 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 17%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 14 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2019.
All research outputs
#18,685,768
of 23,152,542 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Optometry
#76
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,832
of 348,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Optometry
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,152,542 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.