↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

COPD and osteoporosis: links, risks, and treatment challenges

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
Title
COPD and osteoporosis: links, risks, and treatment challenges
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, March 2016
DOI 10.2147/copd.s79638
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daisuke Inoue, Reiko Watanabe, Ryo Okazaki

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic inflammatory airway disease associated with various systemic comorbidities including osteoporosis. Osteoporosis and its related fractures are common and have significant impacts on quality of life and even respiratory function in patients with COPD. COPD-associated osteoporosis is however extremely undertreated. Recent studies have suggested that both decreased bone mineral density (BMD) and impaired bone quality contribute to bone fragility, causing fractures in COPD patients. Various clinical risk factors of osteoporosis in COPD patients, including older age, emaciation, physical inactivity, and vitamin D deficiency, have also been described. It is critically important for pulmonologists to be aware of the high prevalence of osteoporosis in COPD patients and evaluate them for such fracture risks. Routine screening for osteoporosis will enable physicians to diagnose COPD patients with comorbid osteoporosis at an early stage and give them appropriate treatment to prevent fracture, which may lead to improved quality of life as well as better long-term prognosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 148 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 18%
Student > Master 16 11%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 33 22%
Unknown 37 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 6%
Sports and Recreations 6 4%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 44 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,558,161
of 25,582,611 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#248
of 2,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,185
of 313,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#9
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,582,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.