↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Traumatic brain injury: future assessment tools and treatment prospects

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
Title
Traumatic brain injury: future assessment tools and treatment prospects
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, October 2008
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s1985
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven R Flanagan, Joshua B Cantor, Teresa A Ashman

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is widespread and leads to death and disability in millions of individuals around the world each year. Overall incidence and prevalence of TBI are likely to increase in absolute terms in the future. Tackling the problem of treating TBI successfully will require improvements in the understanding of normal cerebral anatomy, physiology, and function throughout the lifespan, as well as the pathological and recuperative responses that result from trauma. New treatment approaches and combinations will need to be targeted to the heterogeneous needs of TBI populations. This article explores and evaluates the research evidence in areas that will likely lead to a reduction in TBI-related morbidity and improved outcomes. These include emerging assessment instruments and techniques in areas of structural/chemical and functional neuroimaging and neuropsychology, advances in the realms of cell-based therapies and genetics, promising cognitive rehabilitation techniques including cognitive remediation and the use of electronic technologies including assistive devices and virtual reality, and the emerging field of complementary and alternative medicine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 187 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 16%
Student > Master 28 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 44 22%
Unknown 30 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 28%
Psychology 39 19%
Engineering 15 7%
Neuroscience 14 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 39 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2016.
All research outputs
#14,913,921
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,360
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,460
of 101,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#17
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.