↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Common methods of biological age estimation

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
Title
Common methods of biological age estimation
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, May 2017
DOI 10.2147/cia.s134921
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linpei Jia, Weiguang Zhang, Xiangmei Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 174 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 44 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Engineering 7 4%
Other 37 21%
Unknown 55 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,230,503
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#116
of 1,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,771
of 325,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#7
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.