↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Salzmann nodular degeneration: prevalence, impact, and management strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
<p>Salzmann nodular degeneration: prevalence, impact, and management strategies</p>
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, July 2019
DOI 10.2147/opth.s166280
Authors

Vikram Paranjpe, Anat Galor, Pedro Monsalve, Sander Dubovy, Carol Karp

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 22%
Other 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 9 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Unknown 11 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2019.
All research outputs
#14,350,108
of 21,376,549 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,476
of 2,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,408
of 281,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#57
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,376,549 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,891 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.