↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Guidelines for acute management of hyperammonemia in the Middle East region

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Guidelines for acute management of hyperammonemia in the Middle East region
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, March 2016
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s93144
Pubmed ID
Authors

Majid Alfadhel, Fuad Al Mutairi, Nawal Makhseed, Fatma Al Jasmi, Khalid Al-Thihli, Emtithal Al-Jishi, Moeenaldeen AlSayed, Zuhair N Al-Hassnan, Fathiya Al-Murshedi, Johannes Häberle, Tawfeg Ben-Omran

Abstract

Hyperammonemia is a life-threatening event that can occur at any age. If treated, the early symptoms in all age groups could be reversible. If untreated, hyperammonemia could be toxic and cause irreversible brain damage to the developing brain. There are major challenges that worsen the outcome of hyperammonemic individuals in the Middle East. These include: lack of awareness among emergency department physicians about proper management of hyperammonemia, strained communication between physicians at primary, secondary, and tertiary hospitals, and shortage of the medications used in the acute management of hyperammonemia. Therefore, the urge to develop regional guidelines is extremely obvious. We searched PubMed and Embase databases to include published materials from 2011 to 2014 that were not covered by the European guidelines, which was published in 2012. We followed the process of a Delphi conference and involved one preliminary meeting and two follow-up meetings with email exchanges between the Middle East Hyperammonemia and Urea Cycle Disorders Scientific Group regarding each draft of the manuscript. We have developed consensus guidelines based on the highest available level of evidence. The aim of these guidelines is to homogenize and harmonize the treatment protocols used for patients with acute hyperammonemia, and to provide a resource to not only metabolic physicians, but also physicians who may come in contact with individuals with acute hyperammonemia. These suggested guidelines aim to ease the challenges faced by physicians dealing with acute hyperammonemia in the region. In addition, guidelines have demonstrated useful collaboration between experts in the region, and provides information that will hopefully improve the outcomes of patients with acute hyperammonemia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 59 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Other 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 21 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 22 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,496,106
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#313
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,417
of 312,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#10
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.