| Title |
PROMs data: can it be used to make decisions for individual patients? A narrative review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient related outcome measures, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/prom.s156291 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan Field, Michelle M Holmes, Dave Newell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 40% |
| Canada | 2 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| France | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 153 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 14% |
| Researcher | 21 | 14% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 16% |
| Unknown | 61 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 67 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,197,116
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Patient related outcome measures
#25
of 186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,296
of 364,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient related outcome measures
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them