↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Patient and physician preferences for attributes of biologic medications for severe asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
<p>Patient and physician preferences for attributes of biologic medications for severe asthma</p>
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, July 2019
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s198953
Authors

Heather L Gelhorn, Zaneta Balantac, Christopher S Ambrose, Yen N Chung, Brian Stone

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 21%
Other 1 7%
Librarian 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 43%
Psychology 2 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Mathematics 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 2 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2019.
All research outputs
#12,356,927
of 15,549,197 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,003
of 1,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,969
of 261,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,549,197 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,221 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.