↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Effects of combined training vs aerobic training on cognitive functions in COPD: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
Title
Effects of combined training vs aerobic training on cognitive functions in COPD: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, April 2016
DOI 10.2147/copd.s96663
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovanna Aquino, Enzo Iuliano, Alessandra di Cagno, Angela Vardaro, Giovanni Fiorilli, Stefano Moffa, Alfonso Di Costanzo, Giuseppe De Simone, Giuseppe Calcagno

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of high-intensity aerobic training (AT) and high-intensity aerobic training combined with resistance training (ie, combined training [CT]) on cognitive function in patients with COPD. Twenty-eight Caucasian male patients (68.35±9.64 years; mean ± SD) with COPD were recruited and randomized into two groups, AT and CT. Both groups performed physical reconditioning for 4 weeks, with a frequency of five training sessions per week. The CT group completed two daily sessions of 30 minutes: one aerobic session and one strength session, respectively; The AT group performed two 30-minute aerobic endurance exercise sessions on treadmill. Physical and cognitive function tests were performed before and after the training intervention performances. Exercise training improved the following cognitive functions: long-term memory, verbal fluency, attentional capacity, apraxia, and reasoning skills (P<0.01). Moreover, the improvements in the CT group were significantly greater than those in the AT group in long-term memory, apraxia, and reasoning skills (P<0.05). CT may be a possible strategy to prevent cognitive decline and associated comorbidities in male patients with COPD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 233 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 42 18%
Student > Master 37 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 7%
Researcher 13 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 74 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 37 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 12%
Psychology 15 6%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 86 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2018.
All research outputs
#6,435,931
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#715
of 2,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,258
of 315,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#23
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.