↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Using mobile technology to promote safe sex and sexual health in adolescents: current practices and future recommendations

Overview of attention for article published in Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 145)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Using mobile technology to promote safe sex and sexual health in adolescents: current practices and future recommendations
Published in
Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, April 2016
DOI 10.2147/ahmt.s69853
Pubmed ID
Authors

Judith B Cornelius, Josephine A Appiah

Abstract

Youth and young adults (19-24 years of age) shoulder the burden of sexually transmitted infections accounting for nearly half of all new infections annually. Mobile technology is one way that we have reached this population with safer sex information but challenges exist with the delivery process. The literature between 2010 and 2015 was reviewed for data on safe sex and sexual health information delivered using mobile cell phone devices. A search for relevant databases revealed that 17 articles met our inclusion criteria. Findings suggest that mobile cell phone interventions are an effective mode for delivering safe sex and sexual health information to youth; those at the highest risk may not be able to access cell phones based on availability and cost of the text messages or data plans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 19%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 14 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Social Sciences 7 13%
Psychology 6 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 15 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2016.
All research outputs
#3,819,523
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#40
of 145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,262
of 315,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.