↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Parkinson’s disease managing reversible neurodegeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Parkinson’s disease managing reversible neurodegeneration
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, April 2016
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s98367
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marty Hinz, Alvin Stein, Ted Cole, Beth McDougall, Mark Westaway

Abstract

Traditionally, the Parkinson's disease (PD) symptom course has been classified as an irreversible progressive neurodegenerative disease. This paper documents 29 PD and treatment-induced systemic depletion etiologies which cause and/or exacerbate the seven novel primary relative nutritional deficiencies associated with PD. These reversible relative nutritional deficiencies (RNDs) may facilitate and accelerate irreversible progressive neurodegeneration, while other reversible RNDs may induce previously undocumented reversible pseudo-neurodegeneration that is hiding in plain sight since the symptoms are identical to the symptoms being experienced by the PD patient. Documented herein is a novel nutritional approach for reversible processes management which may slow or halt irreversible progressive neurodegenerative disease and correct reversible RNDs whose symptoms are identical to the patient's PD symptoms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 15%
Other 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 42%
Neuroscience 3 12%
Computer Science 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,226,900
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#275
of 3,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,583
of 315,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#11
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.