| Title |
Patient interpretation of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) Short Form
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s204188 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Trude R Balstad, Asta Bye, Cathrine RS Jenssen, Tora S Solheim, Lene Thoresen, Kari Sand |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 112 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 55 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 59 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2019.
All research outputs
#14,653,241
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#731
of 1,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,530
of 360,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#9
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.