| Title |
A double-blind, randomized, comparative study of the use of a combination of uridine triphosphate trisodium, cytidine monophosphate disodium, and hydroxocobalamin, versus isolated treatment with hydroxocobalamin, in patients presenting with compressive neuralgias
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s123045 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Henrique Goldberg, Marco Antonio Mibielli, Carlos Pereira Nunes, Stephanie Wrobel Goldberg, Luiz Buchman, Spyros GE Mezitis, Helio Rzetelna, Lisa Oliveira, Mauro Geller, Fernanda Wajnsztajn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 12% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 24% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2024.
All research outputs
#20,505,958
of 25,200,621 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,554
of 1,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,905
of 431,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#50
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,200,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.