↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Orthostatic tremor: current challenges and future prospects

Overview of attention for article published in Degenerative Neurological and Neuromuscular Disease, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Orthostatic tremor: current challenges and future prospects
Published in
Degenerative Neurological and Neuromuscular Disease, April 2016
DOI 10.2147/dnnd.s84742
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip Babatunde Adebayo

Abstract

This review provides an outlook of orthostatic tremor (OT), a rare adult-onset tremor characterized by subjective unsteadiness during standing that is relieved by sitting or walking. Recent case series with a long-time follow-up have shown that the disease is slowly progressive, spatially spreads to the upper limbs, and other neurological disorders may develop in about one-third of the patients. The diagnosis of OT hinges on the typical history of unsteadiness during standing, which is confirmed by electromyographic findings of a 13-18 Hz tremor that is typically absent during tonic activation while the patient is sitting and lying. Although the tremor is generated by a central oscillator, cerebellar and/or basal ganglia dysfunction are needed for its manifestation (double lesion hypothesis). However, functional neuroimaging findings have not consistently implicated the dopaminergic system in its pathogenesis. Drug treatments have been largely disappointing with no sustained benefits, although thalamic deep brain stimulation has helped some patients. Large-scale follow-up studies, more drug trials, and novel therapies are urgently needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Lecturer 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 5 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Engineering 2 13%
Sports and Recreations 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2019.
All research outputs
#15,048,620
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Degenerative Neurological and Neuromuscular Disease
#48
of 89 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,007
of 315,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Degenerative Neurological and Neuromuscular Disease
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.