↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Repression of the miR-93-enhanced sensitivity of bladder carcinoma to chemotherapy involves the regulation of LASS2

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Repression of the miR-93-enhanced sensitivity of bladder carcinoma to chemotherapy involves the regulation of LASS2
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, March 2016
DOI 10.2147/ott.s97399
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jingyu Liu, Haifeng Wang, Yan Wang, Zhenkun Li, Yi Pan, Qiying Liu, Mingying Yang, Jiansong Wang

Abstract

The aberrant expression of miRNA has an important function in bladder cancer (BC). Previous studies indicate that LASS2 is involved in the development of sensitivity to chemotherapy in cancer cells. In the present study, the miRNAs related to LASS2 were selected by using miRNA profiling to distinguish chemo-resistant and chemo-sensitive tumor specimens from patients. Higher levels of miR-93 were observed in the cisplatin-resistant BC cell line RT4, compared to the cell line T24. The role of miR-93 in chemo-sensitivity was demonstrated both in cell culture and mouse tumor xenograft models. We found that inhibiting miR-93 promoted cisplatin-induced apoptosis due to the accumulation of DNA damage. A reporter gene assay was performed, and the results showed miR-93 was not a target of the 3' untranslated region of LASS2, but had an altered protein expression level. Inhibitors of miR-93 could also enhance the chemo-sensitivity of tumor cells transfected with si-LASS2, but the effect was very slight. These findings suggest that miR-93 plays an important role in the chemo-sensitivity of BC, and may be involved in regulating the LASS2 gene.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 60%
Lecturer 1 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 60%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2016.
All research outputs
#14,914,476
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#744
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,148
of 312,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#26
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.