| Title |
On-field assessment of concussion: clinical utility of the King-Devick test
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/oajsm.s171815 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew D Legarreta, Nishit Mummareddy, Aaron M Yengo-Kahn, Scott L Zuckerman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 67% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 27% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
| Psychology | 2 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,247,836
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#59
of 251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,401
of 346,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them