| Title |
Rectal enema of bupivacaine in cancer patients with tenesmus pain – case series
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s192308 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Grzegorz Kowalski, Wojciech Leppert, Michal Adamski, Danuta Szkutnik-Fiedler, Ewa Baczyk, Malgorzata Domagalska, Agnieszka Bienert, Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 86% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 28% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,919,260
of 23,921,147 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#576
of 1,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,177
of 352,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#24
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,921,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.