| Title |
Cardioprotective effect of transcutaneous electrical acupuncture point stimulation on perioperative elderly patients with coronary heart disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s210751 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Huizhou Li, Chuan Wu, Caizhen Yan, Shuang Zhao, Shuhong Yang, Peng Liu, Xin Liu, Mingjie Wang, Xiuli Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Researcher | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 30 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 35 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2021.
All research outputs
#14,924,082
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#972
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,841
of 350,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#21
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.