↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Medicine possession ratio as proxy for adherence to antiepileptic drugs: prevalence, associations, and cost implications

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Medicine possession ratio as proxy for adherence to antiepileptic drugs: prevalence, associations, and cost implications
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, April 2016
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s98940
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen Jacobs, Marlene Julyan, Martie S Lubbe, Johanita R Burger, Marike Cockeran

Abstract

To determine the adherence status to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) among epilepsy patients; to observe the association between adherence status and age, sex, active ingredient prescribed, treatment period, and number of comorbidities; and to determine the effect of nonadherence on direct medicine treatment cost of AEDs. A retrospective study analyzing medicine claims data obtained from a South African pharmaceutical benefit management company was performed. Patients of all ages (N=19,168), who received more than one prescription for an AED, were observed from 2008 to 2013. The modified medicine possession ratio (MPRm) was used as proxy to determine the adherence status to AED treatment. The MPRm was considered acceptable (adherent) if the calculated value was ≥80%, but ≤110%, whereas an MPRm of <80% (unacceptably low) or >110% (unacceptably high) was considered nonadherent. Direct medicine treatment cost was calculated by summing the medical scheme contribution and patient co-payment associated with each AED prescription. Only 55% of AEDs prescribed to 19,168 patients during the study period had an acceptable MPRm. MPRm categories depended on the treatment period (P>0.0001; Cramer's V=0.208) but were independent of sex (P<0.182; Cramer's V=0.009). Age group (P<0.0001; Cramer's V=0.067), active ingredient (P<0.0001; Cramer's V=0.071), and number of comor-bidities (P<0.0001; Cramer's V=0.050) were statistically but not practically significantly associated with MPRm categories. AEDs with an unacceptably high MPRm contributed to 3.74% (US$736,376.23) of the total direct cost of all AEDs included in the study, whereas those with an unacceptably low MPRm amounted to US$3,227,894.85 (16.38%). Nonadherence to antiepileptic treatment is a major problem, encompassing ~20% of cost in our study. Adherence, however, is likely to improve with the treatment period. Further research is needed to determine the factors influencing epileptic patients' prescription refill adherence.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 20%
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 14 30%