| Title |
Comparison of gait, functional activities, and patient-reported outcome measures in patients with knee osteoarthritis and healthy adults using 3D motion analysis and activity monitoring: an exploratory case-control analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orthopedic research and reviews, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/orr.s199107 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Valerie Sparkes, Gemma M Whatling, Paul Biggs, Nidal Khatib, Mohammad Al-Amri, David Williams, Rebecca Hemming, Martina Hagen, Ishaak Saleem, Ramesh Swaminathan, Cathy Holt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 33 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 14 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 39 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,765,949
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Orthopedic research and reviews
#29
of 118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,029
of 350,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orthopedic research and reviews
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.