| Title |
Long-Term Prospective Clinical And Radiographic Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Lateral Transiliac Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/mder.s219862 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter G Whang, Emily Darr, S Craig Meyer, Don Kovalsky, Clay Frank, Harry Lockstadt, Robert Limoni, Andy J Redmond, Philip Ploska, Michael Oh, Abhineet Chowdhary, Daniel Cher, Travis Hillen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 43% |
| Engineering | 3 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,127,150
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#18
of 313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,477
of 351,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.