| Title |
A cultural adaptation and validation study of a self-report measure of the extent of and reasons for medication nonadherence among patients with diabetes in Singapore
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s208736 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuan Wei Liau, Celine Cheow, Kenneth Tin Yau Leung, Hejing Tan, Suat Fern Low, Hua Heng McVin Cheen, Woan Chyi Lim, Li Ling Tan, Joyce Zhen Yin Tan, Eng Sing Lee, Sandra Jialun Xu, Corrinne Yong Koon Tan, Jie Wen Phang, Jie Kie Phang, Miao Hui Lam, Dan V Blalock, Corrine I Voils, Kai Zhen Yap, Yu Heng Kwan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 16% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 10% |
| Psychology | 5 | 8% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2019.
All research outputs
#20,881,763
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,436
of 1,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,130
of 364,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#19
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.