| Title |
A comparative study of the prevalence of hyperkalemia with the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors versus angiotensin receptor blockers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.2147/tcrm.s5176 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Seyed Ali Sadjadi, James I McMillan, Navin Jaipaul, Patricia Blakely, Su Su Hline |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| France | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 18% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 22% |
| Unknown | 22 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 36% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 25 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2021.
All research outputs
#6,443,957
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#311
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,129
of 122,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.