↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Clinical factors affecting quality of life of patients with asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Clinical factors affecting quality of life of patients with asthma
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, April 2016
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s103043
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bartosz Uchmanowicz, Bernard Panaszek, Izabella Uchmanowicz, Joanna Rosińczuk

Abstract

In recent years, there has been increased interest in the subjective quality of life (QoL) of patients with bronchial asthma. QoL is a significant indicator guiding the efforts of professionals caring for patients, especially chronically ill ones. The identification of factors affecting the QoL reported by patients, despite their existing condition, is important and useful to provide multidisciplinary care for these patients. To investigate the clinical factors affecting asthma patients' QoL. The study comprised 100 patients (73 female, 27 male) aged 18-84 years (mean age was 45.7) treated in the Allergy Clinic of the Wroclaw Medical University Department and Clinic of Internal Diseases, Geriatrics and Allergology. All asthma patients meeting the inclusion criteria were invited to participate. Data on sociodemographic and clinical variables were collected. In this study, we used medical record analysis and two questionnaires: the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) to assess the QoL of patients with asthma and the Asthma Control Test to measure asthma control. Active smokers were shown to have a significantly lower QoL in the "Symptoms" domain than nonsmokers (P=0.006). QoL was also demonstrated to decrease significantly as the frequency of asthma exacerbations increased (R=-0.231, P=0.022). QoL in the domain "Activity limitation" was shown to increase significantly along with the number of years of smoking (R=0.404; P=0.004). Time from onset and the dominant symptom of asthma significantly negatively affected QoL in the "Activity limitation" domain of the AQLQ (R=-0.316, P=0.001; P=0.029, respectively). QoL scores in the "Emotional function" and "Environmental stimuli" subscale of the AQLQ decreased significantly as time from onset increased (R=-0.200, P=0.046; R=-0.328, P=0.001, respectively). Patients exhibiting better symptom control have higher QoL scores. Asthma patients' QoL decreases as time from onset increases. A lower QoL is reported by patients who visit allergy clinics more often, and those often hospitalized due to asthma. Smoking also contributes to a lower QoL in asthma patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 15%
Other 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 22 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 24 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,000,263
of 25,582,611 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#454
of 1,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,248
of 315,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#21
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,582,611 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.