↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Differential pharmacology and clinical utility of empagliflozin in type 2 diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
10 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Differential pharmacology and clinical utility of empagliflozin in type 2 diabetes
Published in
Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications, April 2016
DOI 10.2147/cpaa.s77754
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kashif M Munir, Stephen N Davis

Abstract

With rates of obesity and diabetes rising across the world, effective therapies to treat hyperglycemia and its associated comorbidities continue to be in demand. Empagliflozin is a highly selective sodium glucose transporter-2 inhibitor that improves serum glucose levels by inducing glucosuria. Taken orally, it is rapidly absorbed with linear pharmacokinetics consistent in Asian and Caucasian populations. Empagliflozin treatment demonstrates consistent reductions in hemoglobin A1c, fasting plasma glucose, body weight, and blood pressure in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Improvements in glycemic control and metabolic end points are evident with empagliflozin monotherapy, as add-on to oral hypoglycemics or add-on to insulin. The nonglycemic effects of empagliflozin with consistent improvements in blood pressure, body weight, and waist circumference provide additional rationale for use in patients with type 2 diabetes. Moreover, treatment with empagliflozin has recently shown significant reductions in both microvascular and macrovascular complications of diabetes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 20%
Student > Master 11 19%
Other 7 12%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 42%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 15 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,261,756
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications
#81
of 179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,556
of 314,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them