↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Comparison Of Surgical Outcomes Of 360° Circumferential Trabeculotomy Versus Sectoral Excisional Goniotomy With The Kahook Dual Blade At 6 Months

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Comparison Of Surgical Outcomes Of 360° Circumferential Trabeculotomy Versus Sectoral Excisional Goniotomy With The Kahook Dual Blade At 6 Months
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, October 2019
DOI 10.2147/opth.s208468
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew T Hirabayashi, Dayeong Lee, Joshua T King, Samuel Thomsen, Jella A An

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 17%
Student > Master 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 16 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2019.
All research outputs
#16,057,393
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,345
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,383
of 362,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#31
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.