↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Interventions to reduce the risk of violence toward emergency department staff: current approaches

Overview of attention for article published in Open access emergency medicine OAEM, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
Interventions to reduce the risk of violence toward emergency department staff: current approaches
Published in
Open access emergency medicine OAEM, April 2016
DOI 10.2147/oaem.s69976
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola Ramacciati, Andrea Ceccagnoli, Beniamino Addey, Enrico Lumini, Laura Rasero

Abstract

The phenomenon of workplace violence in health care settings, and especially in the emergency department (ED), has assumed the dimensions of a real epidemic. Many studies highlight the need for methods to ensure the safety of staff and propose interventions to address the problem. The aim of this review was to propose a narrative of the current approaches to reduce workplace violence in the ED, with a particular focus on evaluating the effectiveness of emergency response programs. A search was conducted between December 1, 2015 and December 7, 2015, in PubMed and CINAHL. Ten intervention studies were selected and analyzed. Seven of these interventions were based on sectoral interventions and three on comprehensive actions. The studies that have attempted to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions have shown weak evidence to date. Further research is needed to identify effective actions to promote a safe work environment in the ED.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 124 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 10%
Other 11 9%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 33 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 39 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 25%
Psychology 6 5%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 35 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2021.
All research outputs
#5,469,328
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Open access emergency medicine OAEM
#51
of 231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,543
of 315,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open access emergency medicine OAEM
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them