| Title |
Evaluating ibrutinib in the treatment of symptomatic Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Blood Medicine, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jbm.s183997 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aristea-Maria Papanota, Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, Efstathios Kastritis, Meletios A Dimopoulos, Maria Gavriatopoulou |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,547,401
of 25,402,528 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Blood Medicine
#116
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,677
of 359,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Blood Medicine
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,528 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.