↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Patients’ Perspective And Usefulness Of Pictograms In Short-Term Antibiotic Therapy – Multicenter, Randomized Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Patients’ Perspective And Usefulness Of Pictograms In Short-Term Antibiotic Therapy – Multicenter, Randomized Trial
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, October 2019
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s214419
Pubmed ID
Authors

Piotr Merks, Damian Świeczkowski, Marcin Balcerzak, Ewelina Drelich, Katarzyna Białoszewska, Natalia Cwalina, Szymon Zdanowski, Jerzy Krysiński, Grażyna Gromadzka, Miłosz Jaguszewski

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 27 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 30 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2019.
All research outputs
#15,749,194
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#865
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,682
of 362,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#11
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.