↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Assessment of corneal astigmatism following frown and straight incision forms in sutureless manual small incision cataract surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Optometry, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 103)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of corneal astigmatism following frown and straight incision forms in sutureless manual small incision cataract surgery
Published in
Clinical Optometry, April 2016
DOI 10.2147/opto.s98920
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugene Appenteng Osae, Angela Ofeibea Amedo, Kwadwo Amoah, Nana Yaa Koomson, David Kumah

Abstract

To investigate which of two tunnel incision forms (frown versus straight) in sutureless manual small incision cataract surgery creates more corneal astigmatism. Sixty eyes of 60 patients who had consented to undergo cataract surgery and to partake in this study were followed from baseline through >12-week postoperative period. Values of preoperative and postoperative corneal astigmatism for the 60 eyes, measured with a Bausch and Lomb keratometer, were extracted from the patients' cataract surgery records. Residual astigmatism was computed as the difference between preoperative and postoperative keratometry readings. Visual acuity was assessed during the preoperative period and at each postoperative visit with a Snellen chart at 6 m. Fifty eyes of 50 patients were successfully followed-up on. Overall, the mean residual astigmatism was 0.75±0.12 diopters. The differences in mean residual astigmatism between the two different incision groups were statistically significant (t [48]=6.33, P<0.05); frown incision group recorded 1.00±0.12 diopters, whereas the straight incision group recorded 0.50±0.12 diopters. No significant difference was observed between male and female groups (t [48]=0.24, P>0.05). Residual corneal astigmatism in the frown incision group was significantly higher than in the straight incision group. Fisher's exact test did not reveal a significant association between incision forms and visual acuity during the entire postoperative period (P>0.05).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Student > Postgraduate 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Unspecified 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 59%
Unspecified 2 12%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2018.
All research outputs
#6,011,133
of 22,865,319 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Optometry
#21
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,129
of 300,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Optometry
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,865,319 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.