| Title |
Microwave ablation compared with radiofrequency ablation for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
OncoTargets and therapy, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ott.s204340 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mrudula B Glassberg, Sudip Ghosh, Jeffrey W Clymer, Rana A Qadeer, Nicole C Ferko, Behnam Sadeghirad, George WJ Wright, Joseph F Amaral |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 21% |
| Unknown | 31 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 37% |
| Engineering | 7 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 36 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2019.
All research outputs
#16,010,525
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#852
of 3,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,324
of 360,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#26
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,014 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.