↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on acute postoperative pain intensity and mobility after hip fracture: A double-blinded, randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
293 Mendeley
Title
Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on acute postoperative pain intensity and mobility after hip fracture: A double-blinded, randomized trial
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2019
DOI 10.2147/cia.s203658
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michal Elboim-Gabyzon, Sahar Andrawus Najjar, Haim Shtarker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 293 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 14%
Student > Master 30 10%
Unspecified 23 8%
Researcher 10 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 3%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 151 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 50 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 12%
Unspecified 23 8%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Other 19 6%
Unknown 157 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2020.
All research outputs
#6,758,664
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#626
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,663
of 362,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#15
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.