| Title |
Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on acute postoperative pain intensity and mobility after hip fracture: A double-blinded, randomized trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s203658 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michal Elboim-Gabyzon, Sahar Andrawus Najjar, Haim Shtarker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 290 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 11% |
| Researcher | 10 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 10% |
| Unknown | 164 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 50 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 7% |
| Unknown | 170 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2020.
All research outputs
#6,758,664
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#626
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,663
of 362,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#15
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.