| Title |
Curcumin alleviates pain and improves cognitive impairment in a rat model of cobra venom-induced trigeminal neuralgia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s162668 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Li Zhang, Xinli Ding, Zhe Wu, Min Wang, Ming Tian |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 6 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 21% |
| Unknown | 7 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2018.
All research outputs
#4,259,067
of 23,173,635 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#452
of 1,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,223
of 330,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#13
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,173,635 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,778 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.