| Title |
Identification of the optimal cognitive drugs among Alzheimer’s disease: a Bayesian meta-analytic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s184968 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jinghong Liang, Jiayu Li, Ruixia Jia, Yingquan Wang, Rongkun Wu, Hongbo Zhang, Lei Hang, Yong Xu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 24 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 20% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,417,018
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#370
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,424
of 354,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#13
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.