↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Chronic intermittent hypoxia and obstructive sleep apnea: an experimental and clinical approach

Overview of attention for article published in Hypoxia, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Chronic intermittent hypoxia and obstructive sleep apnea: an experimental and clinical approach
Published in
Hypoxia, April 2016
DOI 10.2147/hp.s103091
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emilia Sforza, Fréderic Roche

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent sleep disorder considered as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular consequences, such as systemic arterial hypertension, ischemic heart disease, cardiac arrhythmias, metabolic disorders, and cognitive dysfunction. The pathogenesis of OSA-related consequence is assumed to be chronic intermittent hypoxia (IH) inducing alterations at the molecular level, oxidative stress, persistent systemic inflammation, oxygen sensor activation, and increase of sympathetic activity. Overall, these mechanisms have an effect on vessel permeability and are considered to be important factors for explaining vascular, metabolic, and cognitive OSA-related consequences. The present review attempts to examine together the research paradigms and clinical studies on the effect of acute and chronic IH and the potential link with OSA. We firstly describe the literature data on the mechanisms activated by acute and chronic IH at the experimental level, which are very helpful and beneficial to explaining OSA consequences. Then, we describe in detail the effect of IH in patients with OSA that we can consider "the human model" of chronic IH. In this way, we can better understand the specific pathophysiological mechanisms proposed to explain the consequences of IH in OSA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 133 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Master 15 11%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 44 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Neuroscience 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 53 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2016.
All research outputs
#14,848,594
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from Hypoxia
#22
of 48 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,353
of 300,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hypoxia
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one scored the same or higher as 26 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.