↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Manganese dioxide nanosheets-based redox/pH-responsive drug delivery system for cancer theranostic application

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Manganese dioxide nanosheets-based redox/pH-responsive drug delivery system for cancer theranostic application
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, April 2016
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s98832
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yongwei Hao, Lei Wang, Bingxiang Zhang, Dong Li, Dehui Meng, Jinjin Shi, Hongling Zhang, Zhenzhong Zhang, Yun Zhang

Abstract

The aim of this study was to construct redox- and pH-responsive degradable manganese dioxide (MnO2) nanosheets for cancer theranostic application. The small MnO2 nanosheets were synthesized, and then functionalized by hyaluronic acid (HA), demonstrating excellent stability and tumor-targeting ability. Cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum [CDDP]) was absorbed by the nanosheets through a physical action, which was designed as MnO2/HA/CDDP. The prepared MnO2/HA/CDDP formulation was able to efficiently deliver CDDP to tumor cells in vitro and in vivo, resulting in improved therapeutic efficiency. Subsequently, they were triggered by lower pH and higher level of reduced glutathione to generate Mn(2+), enabling magnetic resonance imaging. The smart multifunctional system combining efficient magnetic resonance imaging and chemotherapy has the potential to be used as a tumor-targeting theranostic nanomedicine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 28%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 6 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 16 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2023.
All research outputs
#6,754,462
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#697
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,554
of 314,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#18
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.