↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Voltammetric determination of melatonin using a graphene-based sensor in pharmaceutical products

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Voltammetric determination of melatonin using a graphene-based sensor in pharmaceutical products
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, May 2016
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s104941
Pubmed ID
Authors

Irina Mirela Apetrei, Constantin Apetrei

Abstract

Melatonin can be sensitively detected in pharmaceuticals by cyclic voltammetry and fixed-potential amperometry using a graphene-based sensor. The sensor characterization of cyclic voltammetry constantly provides high values of electrode active area and heterogeneous rate constant. In optimal conditions, the sensor was applied for the determination of melatonin in different pharmaceutical samples. The sensitivity to melatonin was 0.0371 A M(-1), and the limit of detection was 0.87×10(-6) M. The data obtained by using the graphene-based sensor for the detection of melatonin in pharmaceutical products were in good agreement with the data provided by the producer. Since no interferences from the excipients were found, using a separation technique was not necessary. Additionally, the low price, ease of handling, small amount of sample, short time per analysis, and possibility of automation are the important advantages that recommend this methodology for quality control of pharmaceuticals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 26 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 31 35%
Materials Science 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Engineering 3 3%
Chemical Engineering 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 34 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,714,565
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#900
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,208
of 311,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#30
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.