↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Modern management of malignant pleural mesothelioma

Overview of attention for article published in Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 128)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Modern management of malignant pleural mesothelioma
Published in
Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy, May 2016
DOI 10.2147/lctt.s83338
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shivani C Patel, Jonathan E Dowell

Abstract

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a deadly disease that produces a significant worldwide health care burden. The majority of cases are associated with prior asbestos exposure, but recent studies have identified a possible genetic predisposition in a minority of patients. Historically, obtaining a pathologic diagnosis of MPM was challenging, but with current pathological techniques, a secure diagnosis is possible in the majority of patients. Curative therapy for MPM remains elusive, and the primary treatment option for fit patients is platinum-based chemotherapy. Encouraging recent reports suggest that there may be a benefit to the addition of bevacizumab to standard chemotherapy as well as with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in MPM. Selected patients may be considered for aggressive surgical approaches, but there is considerable controversy regarding the true benefit of surgery and multimodality therapy in this disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 21 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 22 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,302,619
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy
#35
of 128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,922
of 311,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.