<p>Development of a Standard Set of Outcome Domains and Proposed Measures for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Primary Care Physical Therapy Practice in the Netherlands: a Modified RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method</p>
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, November 2019
Verburg, Arie C, van Dulmen, Simone A, Kiers, Henri, Ypinga, Jan HL, Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Maria WG, van der Wees, Philip J
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||50%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||12||14%|
|Student > Bachelor||9||11%|
|Student > Master||8||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Nursing and Health Professions||17||20%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||10||12%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||4||5%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||2||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2019.
All research outputs
of 23,177,498 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
of 2,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 362,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,177,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.