↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Videolaryngoscopy versus fiberoptic bronchoscope for awake intubation – a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Videolaryngoscopy versus fiberoptic bronchoscope for awake intubation – a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, October 2018
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s172783
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jia Jiang, Dan-Xu Ma, Bo Li, An-Shi Wu, Fu-Shan Xue

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 15 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2019.
All research outputs
#10,413,860
of 16,309,331 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#730
of 1,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,334
of 385,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,309,331 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.